:( Justin Timberlake's Net Worth Is Bonkers I regret to inform you that we'll now be watching this:
While we don't know his exact paycheck/residual situation, it's likely in the seven figures based on a deep-dive into Trolls World Tour from The Hollywood Reporter. But nothing pays bigger than the monster franchise that is Trolls (shudder again). Justin has been in a lot of (actually good) movies, including The Social Network and Friends With Benefits, which, btw, reportedly grossed over $55.8 million in the U.S. He's been busy!!! He Made That Sweet, Sweet Trolls Money
He's also dipped his frosted tips into the world of restaurants, had a clothing line that sold at Target for a while, is an investor in several companies, and is a minority owner of the Memphis Grizzlies.
Biel has worked with? Sony, Givenchy, Sauza Liquors, and Levi's-to name a few. Though, to be fair, he did record a whole freakin' song for them. Much of what occurs with both the plot and characters during the latter part of the film feels cobbled together and confused, and sucks whatever momentum the premise had right out of the film.JT Doesn't Merely Do #SponCon.He Does PARTNERSHIPSĪnd they just hit different, ya know? Justin has partnered with a gazillion brands over the years, but most significantly he got a rumored $6 million for McDonalds's “I'm Lovin' It” campaign. (Lines like “Clean your clocks”, “don’t waste my time”, “Can you give me a minute’’ are used to the point where they could spawn their own drinking game.) However, once the formulaic action-movie tropes work their way into the second act, the whole “time is money” metaphor deflates into shallow word substitution. The idea of time as currency has huge thematic potential, and in the first act it seems as though the film will utilise this by exploring issues such as what it is to ‘live’ versus ‘exist’. In Time attempts to follow that trend, only it is unable to synthesise any strong points or conclusions from the socio-economic issues it so clearly (and heavy-handedly) touches on. Niccol has an obvious talent for blending sci-fi elements with human drama in order to raise larger philosophical points about our society. And so the stage is set for him to correct the social injustices that exist in this dystopian future, through a fairly generic, muddled and downright boring script. By a chance encounter, our protagonist Will Salas (Justin Timberlake) is gifted more than a century to spend as he pleases. That interesting concept, though, is unfortunately unable to corral into a quality story. The rich get wealthy by hording years in their vaults – effectively becoming immortal if they take no risks – while the poor cheat, steal or kill just to last another 24 hours. People are bio-engineered to stop aging at 25, at which point their implanted digital clocks countdown whatever time is afforded them. In Time is a film with a fantastic premise – a world operating under Ben Franklin’s adage of “Time is money”. It’s ironic that director Andrew Niccol’s ( Gattaca) new film centres on the concept of trading time – you may just want someone to refund you the two hours wasted by watching it.
0 kommentar(er)
